Return to Essays menu

More Than Allergies ...©
A message to my patients

Dennis Mihalka, DDS October 1, 1998

Although allergies can be irritating nuisances, they can also lead to very serious, life threatening experiences and significant complications. This paper will introduce a food allergy model that may affect nearly one-third of our population. By observing symptoms in infants and children you can help minimize allergy problems and lifetime consequences.

Recent research has provided much information that can be used to explain many of the problems afflicting our society today. Over 3,000 recently published articles have been reviewed to develop the conclusions found in this paper. The picture is like a 1,000-piece jig saw puzzle that is made more clear as the pieces are fitted together. The most important points to remember are:

Each of us has a vested interest in our own and our family's health.
Clear observation of symptoms and cause and effect relationships are key to health.
We must be willing to be flexible in dietary habits to maximize health and minimize disease.
Observe any changes in physical and emotional status and consider the possibility of a food allergy as being the primary trigger.
Consider testing the reaction after remission by introducing the same food and observing the possible return of symptoms. If they do return, eliminate that trigger item from the diet.
Once cause and effect are determined, it then is appropriate to decide if the benefits outweigh the consequences of the ingested food or substance.

The following facts are key to this discussion: Allergies impact over one-third of our population. At birth, the umbilical cord blood of some newborns has been shown to have antibodies to proteins in dairy products and egg whites. Antibodies are created as an immune system response to "foreign" proteins. Other studies report that twenty-nine percent of newborns are allergic to the proteins in dairy products. Of these infants who have an allergic reaction to dairy proteins, 39% have been shown to develop allergies to many other substances which vary throughout the child's lifetime with the reactions peaking at young adulthood. Allergic responses can be triggered by different substances, then may go into remission and possibly return at unpredictable points in one's lifetime. Typical allergy sensitivity tests are about 50% accurate, which leaves elimination diets as the more accurate tool in determining sensitivities or allergies.

A typical infant allergic response can include one or more of the following:

  • Eczema (flaky, dry skin) anywhere on the body
  • Rash (red) anywhere on body, "diaper rash" is common
  • Congested nose
  • Colic
  • Constipation or diarrhea
  • Gastroesophageal reflux (throwing-up)
  • Bed wetting problems
  • Middle ear infections

Any of the above symptoms should be considered an allergic response to proteins to which an infant's immature immune system produces an allergic reaction. It is understood that an infant's immune system matures over a period of time. Hence, the value of breast-feeding. The first milk, called clostrum, provides initial protection for a baby. The continuation of breast-feeding allows the infant to be slowly exposed to "trigger" proteins (allergens) over a period of time, enabling the infant to better adopt to the various allergen-containing foods. Several studies have shown that a baby in the mother's womb can develop allergies to egg whites and dairy products from foods the mother ingests. In other studies, breast-fed infants have been shown to develop allergic reactions to foods eaten by their mother. Studies indicate that cow's milk contains 30 different proteins that have been shown to cause allergies in humans. Once these are digested, over 100 smaller protein segments have been identified as being allergenic. It must be emphasized here that not all infants/adults develop allergies. Statistics show that about one third of our population have allergies. This is a large segment and should cause us to at least consider the "illnesses" and symptoms of our infants, children and adults as being the result of allergic reactions. Allergic reactions have been shown to impact every tissue and system of the human body.

The most significant and most readily observed reaction in infants and children is that of nasal congestion or chronic running and/or stuffy nose. Some may say, "what's a sniffle or two, they are very common in infants, they catch everything?" Illnesses come and go, while allergies continue to reoccur and persist. Consider the disastrous impact of chronic nasal congestion:

  • Chronic colds: congestion resulting in tonsillectomies and removal of adenoids.
  • Nasal congestion: the nose is blocked from breathing.
  • Mouth breathing has to occur: When breathing is blocked the tongue must assume an abnormal, low position in the mouth. Normal position for the tongue is to rest against the roof of the mouth just behind the upper front teeth, which is also the spot upon which the tongue presses in a normal swallowing pattern. (Swallowing occurs 1500 to 2000 times each day.) The resting or swallowing tongue in this low position causes the tongue to press against the front teeth, resulting in numerous orthodontic problems.
  • The roof of the mouth (palate) becomes elevated due to the airflow of mouth breathing.
  • Chronic mouth breathing becomes a habit pattern, especially in the congested infant.
  • If mouth breathing is dominant, growth and development of nasal airways are impacted. The roof of the mouth is the floor of the nose. If the floor is raised, there is less vertical space inside the nose causing a deviated septum and reduced breathing nasal passage size for breathing.
  • Lack of stimulation of the nasal passageways and nares (nose holes) to grow during critical growth periods result in a narrow, flatter bridge and smaller nares. These add to future breathing difficulties, even if there is no congestion. Consider the number of "Breathe Rite Strips" being used today.

Chronic mouth breathers will demonstrate one or more of the following, depending upon severity:
  • A tongue thrust position presses the tongue on or between the teeth with each swallow
  • Space exists between the front teeth even when back teeth are in closed contact (open bite)
  • Speech pathology
  • Narrow upper arches and posterior crossbites and other mild, to severe, orthodontic problems
  • Results in extended orthodontic treatment, with relapses common
  • Grinding of teeth due to the resulting malocclusion
  • Premature wear of back teeth due to the lack of ideal, protective front tooth guidance
  • Premature loss of permanent teeth due to years of wear
  • Possible jaw joint problems
  • Mouth breathing, nasal congestion or inadequacy, contribution to snoring and sleep apnea
  • Sleep may be difficult, therefore less alert during the day. Impact on learning?
  • Mouth breathing results in up to 20% less blood oxygen as compared to nasal breathing
  • The dry air irritates gum tissue and leaves gums more vulnerable to premature disease

Chronic nasal congestion leads to another very serious and epidemic problem: otitis media or middle ear Infection. The opening of the Eustachian tube is in the posterior nasal chamber. Chronic allergies cause nasal congestion, which blocks the Eustachian tubes.

Research on monkeys, published in October of 1997, demonstrated that 85% of the subject monkeys with blocked Eustachian tubes developed middle ear infections. Blockage was accomplished by paralyzing the tensor levi palatini muscle, which opens the Eustachian tube upon each swallow. The fluid and bacteria in the Eustachian tube become static, allowing the bacteria to proliferate and migrate to the middle car, causing infection, pressure and pain.

Baylor Medical School determined that 25 million ear infections occurred in US infants in 1990 and 900,000 ear tubes were placed during the same year. Recent research indicates that infants with middle ear infections will recover at the same rate with or without antibiotics. Consider the significance: the 1990 census reported that there were only 12 million infants up to three years of age. This means many infants had multiple ear infections. This should be considered an epidemic!

Consider other less obvious possible results of early infant allergic reactions:
  • Development of other allergies throughout life
  • Lost school/work time
  • Facial structural development
  • Allergic shiners (darkened gray circles under the eyes)
  • Long, allergic/open-mouth face
  • Short "button like" nose with small nares, narrow and flattened bridge
  • Open mouth posture, raised lip
  • Tongue "hanging out"
  • Deviated septum, polyps
  • Snoring problems
  • Sleep apnea

The large variety of responses and degrees of severity exist, due to a very complex interaction of basic factors, causing the immune response including:
  • Timing of the immune challenge--what systems are at critical developmental stages when the immune reaction occurs? The younger the child, the more significant the impact.
  • Intensity of the immune response--the greater the response, the more the child is affected.
  • Repetition of immune challenge--repeated challenges have more impact. Continuous milk drinking by an allergic person, over months or years, will have a more significant impact than a one time exposure.
  • Duration of the immune response--the longer the immune reaction, the more impact on tissues, organs and systems, habit patterns and functional stimulation (or lack thereof) for growth.
  • Sensitivity of the subject-- the degree of reactivity of the person to the antigen trigger.

In addition to the above, one might consider the possibility that many other unexplained diseases known to mankind may result from the impact of the early and multiple challenges to the fetus' or infant's immune system. Is it possible this might explain many, if not most, of the so-called autoimmune diseases?

Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus is stated to be an autoimmune disease that begins early in a child's life. Lupus, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, rosacea and many other diseases are now thought to be autoimmune. What about SIDS? Would it be logical to consider that, if normal breathing passages are congested, an infant might have difficulty breathing, if not stop breathing altogether? What if the brain of the infant or fetus is developing critical neuronal pathways during an allergic reaction? Is it remotely possible that the normal brain patterns or connections might be disrupted and result in obsessive/compulsive behaviors, ADD or dyslexia?

A study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry (Feb. 1998) discusses pediatric autoimmune, neuropsychiatric disorders (including obsessive-compulsive disorders and others) in fifty pediatric patients. Another author's opinion is that significant challenges to an immature immune system could cause an "over-reaction" which sensitizes the system to over-respond to many otherwise normal protein antigens, explaining lifetime allergies.

In addition, all the systems and chemicals that are activated during such an immune response can and do have an impact on both developing and mature tissues and systems. Consideration for minimizing allergies, colic, congestion, mouth breathing or ear infections in infants, would be more than enough motivation for parents to consider reducing or eliminating the foods that may impact their infants and children. In addition, there are other possibilities, which should motivate concerned parents to consider early infant allergies, their cause and cure.

What to do? Allergy (sensitivity) tests are only about 50% accurate and, as such, do not provide adequate information upon which to depend. Although elimination diets seem difficult and frustrating, they become the direction of choice, certainly before surgery for ear tubes or tonsillectomies. A simplified approach would be for parents to closely observe how their baby is doing (even in utero). Fussing, colicky babies or babies with eczema, nasal congestion, constipation, diarrhea, blood in the stools or babies who throw up (gastroesophageal reflux) should all be suspected of having an allergic reaction.

The first step would be to consider what the baby ingested from just minutes, up to twenty-four hours prior to the reaction. The most common allergenic foods are dairy products, egg whites, wheat, peanuts, soy, and nuts. Some nutrition textbooks state not to give dairy, egg whites or wheat to an infant until age one. If your child has an allergic reaction, begin to suspect substances mentioned: first milk, then egg whites, etc. Be aware that these foods can trigger responses while the baby is in utero as well as when exclusively breast-fed by a mother having consumed these foods. Please note that all children on government breakfast and lunch programs are mandated to drink milk. They must have a note from their doctor in order to avoid drinking milk because of this mandated milk program.

Elimination diets must be just that, elimination, not reduction. An allergic reaction can occur with minute amounts or be triggered by larger and repeated exposures. To rid the system of potential antigens, it takes from four to fourteen days. Most symptoms will diminish within the first week. One of the best indicators of nasal congestion is to observe the child's breathing pattern while he/she is sleeping before and during elimination of the specific food. Easier breathing patterns will be obvious. If the reaction involves the GI tract, there will be less colic, reflux, diarrhea, constipation, bed-wetting, blood in the stools, etc. If eczema is the observed allergic reaction, then it will begin to clear. Watch for any changes and always question behavior or tissue reaction, as it may be a response to what the baby had been exposed.

Just like computers, "garbage in, garbage out." At the very least, our children deserve consideration for the possibilities of early infancy allergies. There is nothing to lose and so much to gain in improving your children's quality of life!

return to top